MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976202521 · doi:10.1159/000122833

In vitro Release of ACTH from Dispersed Rat Pars intermedia Cells. III. Multiple Forms of ACTH Biological Activity

2008· article· en· W1976202521 on OpenAlexaff
Jacob Kraicer, N. L. Elliot, Arthur E. Zimmerman

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroendocrinology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPars intermediaEndocrinologyInternal medicineIn vitroAdrenocorticotropic hormoneChemistryBiologyMedicineHormonePituitary glandBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have reported that both an extract of rat hypothalamus-stalk-median eminence (HE) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) will stimulate the release of ACTH biological activity from acutely, non-enzymically dispersed rat pars intermedia (PI) cells. We have also found that the ACTH activity within the PI cells is composed of 4 chromatographically separable entities, but only a small proportion of the total ACTH activity co-elutes with ACTH1-39. In the present study we subjected the media, after incubation of PI cells with either HE or 5-HT, to sequential chromatography on Sephadex G-50 F and G-100 SF. We found the same 4 ACTH-like moieties as in the PI cell extracts. Only the release of the 2 earliest eluting components, presumably of much larger molecular dimensions than ACTH1-39, was enhanced by either HE or 5-HT. There was no augmented release of the ACTH component having molecular dimensions similar to ACTH1-39. Thus, in our in vitro system, the ACTH biological activity released from PI cells is not the size of ACTH1-39, but is composed of at least 2 much larger molecules which possess ACTH (as well as some MSH) biological activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.714

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroendocrinologySame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207