Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this review, we analyze our effort to demonstrate the effectiveness of a new approach to the treatment of herniated disc disease using Nd:YAG laser energy introduced into a herniated disc under fluoroscopic control and local anesthesia. 2400 PLDD procedures (combined number of decompressions in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar discs were performed in the past 18(1/2) years in 1275 patients. The overall success rate according to the MacNab criteria was 89%. The complication rate (only infectious disciitis) was 0.4%; all 10 patients with complications were cured with appropriate antibiotics. The recurrence rate was 5%, and usually due to reinjury. There were no deaths, and no cases of nerve or cord damage. PLDD is a safe and effective outpatient procedure for the treatment of herniated disc disease with the advantages of relative non-invasiveness, usually immediate relief of back and sciatic pain, early return to work (generally 5-6 days), and a low complication and recurrence rate. It can also be repeated if necessary as many as five times.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".