Modes d’implantation des PME à l’étranger : le choix entre filiale 100 % et coentreprise internationale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette contribution vise à analyser le choix de s’engager sur les marchés étrangers sous la forme d’entreprises conjointes ou de filiales totalement détenues dans le contexte des PME. Cette recherche s’appuie sur une série d’entretiens semi-directifs conduits sur la période de juillet 2010 à septembre 2010 auprès de 10 PME françaises internationalisées. Nous avons adopté une analyse quali-quantitative comparée (AQQC), méthode initiée par Ragin (1987) et bien adaptée pour étudier un petit nombre de cas, particulièrement dans une démarche comparative. Nous montrons que l’implantation d’une filiale industrielle dans un pays culturellement perçu éloigné de la France se fait par recours à un partenariat local, tandis que les filiales totalement détenues sont le fait de PME s’inscrivant dans un modèle d’internationalisation rapide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".