MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Spondylolisthesis, Pelvic Incidence, and Spinopelvic Balance

2004· article· en· W1976241057 on OpenAlexaff
Hubert Labelle, Pierre Roussouly, Éric Berthonnaud, Ensor E. Transfeldt, Michael O’Brien, D. Chopin, Timothy Hresko, J. Dimnet

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePelvic tiltSpondylolisthesisPelvisSagittal planeRadiographyOrthodonticsTrunkLumbar lordosisLumbarNuclear medicineAnatomySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Study Design. A retrospective study of the sagittal alignment in developmental spondylolisthesis. Objectives. To investigate the role of pelvic anatomy and its effect on the global balance of the trunk in developmental spondylolisthesis. Summary of Background Data. Pelvic incidence (PI) is a fundamental anatomic parameter that is specific and constant for each individual, and independent of the three-dimensional orientation of the pelvis. Recent studies have suggested an association between a high PI and patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis. Methods. The lateral standing radiographs of the spine and pelvis of 214 subjects with developmental L5–S1 spondylolisthesis were analyzed with a dedicated software allowing the calculation of the following parameters: pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and grade of spondylolisthesis. All measurements were done by the same individual and compared to those of a cohort of 160 normal subjects. Student’s tests were used to compare the parameters between the curve types and Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to investigate the association between all parameters (α = 0.01). Results. PI, SS, PT, and LL are significantly greater (P < 0.01) in subjects with spondylolisthesis, while TK is significantly decreased. PI has a direct linear correlation (0.41–0.65) with SS, PT, and LL. Furthermore, the differences between the two populations increase in a direct linear fashion as the severity of the spondylolisthesis increases. Conclusions. Since PI is a constant anatomic pelvic variable specific to each individual and strongly determines SS, PT, and LL, which are position-dependent variables, this study suggests that pelvic anatomy has a direct influence on the development of a spondylolisthesis. Study participants with an increased pelvic incidence appear to be at higher risk of presenting a spondylolisthesis, and an increased PI may be an important factor predisposing to progression in developmental spondylolisthesis. This study investigates the relation between pelvic parameters and sagittal spine balance in a cohort of adolescents and young adults with developmental spondylolisthesis, as compared with a cohort of normal subjects. Pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and lumbar lordosis are significantly greater (P < 0.01) in subjects with spondylolisthesis, while thoracic kyphosis is significantly decreased, suggesting that pelvic anatomy has a direct influence on the development of a spondylolisthesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations405
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207