MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976254388 · doi:10.1117/12.707961

Characteristics of femtosecond second-harmonic generation in periodically poled lithium niobate

2006· article· en· W1976254388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhotorefractive and Nonlinear Optics
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLithium niobateFemtosecondMaterials scienceSecond-harmonic generationOptoelectronicsNonlinear opticsOpticsHarmonicLithium (medication)High harmonic generationLaserPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The temporal and spectral characteristics of femtosecond second-harmonic-generation (SHG) in quasi-phase-matched (QPM) periodically poled lithium niobate (PPLN) are investigated experimentally and theoretically. In the experiments, we studied SHG in PPLN waveguides with different device design and fabrication conditions by adopting ~100-fs optical pulses with different peak powers in the 1.55-μm band. Large phase modulation and spectral broadening of the fundamental wave, and a shift of the centre frequency of the second-harmonic wave were observed when the peak power of the fundamental wave was high enough. Saturation of the conversion efficiency was also observed, which depends on fundamental pulse width and peak power. These phenomena could be attributed to nonlinear phase accumulation under large group-velocity mismatch. In the theory, evolutions of pulse waveforms and optical spectra were studied for both the fundamental and second-harmonic pulses by solving the coupled-mode equations. The simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.154
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it