The parasitic ascomycete<i>Mniaecia jungermanniae</i>induces the formation of giant perichaetia and apogamous sporophytes in leafy liverworts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that the apothecia of Mniaecia jungermanniae (Nees ex Fr.) Boud. growing on stems of the liverwort Cephalozia bicuspidata (L.) Dumort. might be the perfect stage of an ascomycete fungus forming a symbiotic association with swollen rhizoids in a liverwort, we grew both axenically and resynthesized the association. Contrary to our expectation, Mniaecia remained extracellular, but induced, on Cephalozia , the formation of giant perichaetia containing supernumerary archegonia followed by parthenogenetic and apogamous sporophytes. This is the first report of these latter two features in liverworts. By analogy with apogamy and apospory in mosses and pteridophytes that are induced by media supplemented with organic nutrients and growth regulators, we suggest that the abnormal structures in Cephalozia resulted from substances produced by Mniaecia. Giant perichaetia and abnormal perianths were also observed on wild colonies of Cephalozia, Diplophyllum , and Scapania heavily infected with Mniaecia. Apart from local depression of perianth formation in the wild, this parasitic fungus appears to cause no long-term damage to its hosts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".