MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1976267783 · doi:10.1139/z07-035

Serum thyroid hormone concentrations and thyroid histomorphology as biomarkers in bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus)

2007· article· en· W1976267783 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Cheryl Rosa, Todd M. O’Hara, Paul F. Hoekstra, Kent R. Refsal, John E. Blake

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsBiologyThyroidEndocrinologyInternal medicineHormoneTriiodothyronineBlubberPhysiologyRadioimmunoassayPolychlorinated biphenylZoologyMedicineEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serum thyroid hormone (TH) concentrations have been used alone or with other measurements to assess health status or effects of toxicant exposure in marine mammals. Histological sections from thyroid glands of the bowhead whale ( Balaena mysticetus L., 1758) were examined in conjunction with serological TH analyses. Serum was assayed for total and free triiodothyronine and total and free thyroxine via radioimmunoassay. Histomorphology of thyroid tissue was assessed by light microscopy and the utilization of an epithelial-follicular index (EFI). Age, sex, or season did not significantly affect serum TH levels. However, TH concentrations in pregnant or lactating females were found to be significantly lower than in the other sex and reproductive groups investigated. The EFI and epithelial height (EH) were greater in spring subadult and adult whales compared with those that were landed in the fall. No correlation was found between serum TH concentrations and serum, blubber, or liver levels of select polychlorinated biphenyl metabolites and organochlorine congeners examined. Low variability in concentrations of the serum THs across age, season, and sex and reproductive groups supports the existence of strong homeostatic mechanisms for maintaining TH concentrations in these presumably healthy animals. Departures from these ranges may indicate a disturbance in these regulatory mechanisms and may be a useful indication of toxicity or other health disorders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Zoology→Same topicMarine animal studies overview→French-language works237,207→