MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976275734 · doi:10.1115/1.4001341

Application of Realizability and Shock Unsteadiness to k−ε Simulations of Under-Expanded Axisymmetric Supersonic Free Jets

2010· article· en· W1976275734 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluids Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsRealizabilitySupersonic speedShock (circulatory)CompressibilityRotational symmetryShock waveMechanicsConstraint (computer-aided design)PhysicsSolverTurbulenceOblique shockApplied mathematicsStatistical physicsClassical mechanicsMathematicsMathematical optimizationGeometryAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An explicit cell-centered finite volume solver coupled to a k−ε turbulence model corrected for structural compressibility fails to satisfactorily predict the behavior of under-expanded supersonic jets exhausting into still air, because the model does not properly account for the turbulence/shock wave interaction. Two approaches are examined: imposing a realizability constraint and taking into account shock unsteadiness effects. Although both corrections yield better agreement with experimental data of under-expanded jets, the realizability constraint yields better results than the shock unsteadiness correction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.337
Threshold uncertainty score0.501

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it