MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976292963 · doi:10.1109/tla.2005.1642441

Generating Ensemble of Classifiers through Unsupervised Feature Selection

2005· article· en· W1976292963 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Latin America Transactions · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom subspace methodArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceFeature selectionHidden Markov modelPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningFeature (linguistics)Selection (genetic algorithm)Cascading classifiersContext (archaeology)Set (abstract data type)Ensemble learningSupport vector machine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we propose a strategy to create ensemble of classifiers based on unsupervised features selection. It takes into account a hierarchical multi-objective genetic algorithm that generates a set of classifiers by performing feature selection and then combines them to provide a set of powerful ensembles. The proposed method is evaluated in the context of handwritten month word recognition, using three different feature sets and Hidden Markov Models as classifiers. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.582
Threshold uncertainty score0.549

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it