MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Determination of the Axial-Vector Weak Coupling Constant with Ultracold Neutrons

2010· article· en· W1976294414 on OpenAlexaff
Jianglai Liu, M. P. Mendenhall, A. T. Holley, H.O. Back, T. J. Bowles, L. J. Broussard, R. Carr, Steven Clayton, S. Currie, B. W. Filippone, A. Garcı́a, P. Geltenbort, K. P. Hickerson, J. Hoagland, G. E. Hogan, B. Hona, T. M. Ito, C.-Y. Liu, M. Makela, R. Mammei, J. W. Martin, D. Melconian, C. L. Morris, R. W. Pattie, A. Pérez Galván, M. L. Pitt, B. Plaster, J. Ramsey, R. R. Rios, Rebecca L. Russell, A. Saunders, S. J. Seestrom, W. E. Sondheim, E. Tatar, R. B. Vogelaar, B. VornDick, C. Wrede, Huan Yan, A. R. Young

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Winnipeg
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltracold neutronsPhysicsNeutronSpallationCoupling constantNuclear physicsPseudovectorAsymmetryCoupling (piping)Spallation Neutron SourceNucleonAtomic physicsParticle physicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A precise measurement of the neutron decay $\ensuremath{\beta}$ asymmetry ${A}_{0}$ has been carried out using polarized ultracold neutrons from the pulsed spallation ultracold neutron source at the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center. Combining data obtained in 2008 and 2009, we report ${A}_{0}=\ensuremath{-}0.119\text{ }66\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.000\text{ }{89}_{\ensuremath{-}0.001\text{ }40}^{+0.001\text{ }23}$, from which we determine the ratio of the axial-vector to vector weak coupling of the nucleon ${g}_{A}/{g}_{V}=\ensuremath{-}1.275\text{ }{90}_{\ensuremath{-}0.004\text{ }45}^{+0.004\text{ }09}$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207