MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1976296481 · doi:10.1139/t07-036

Response to overburden pressure of an HDPE pipe pulled in place by pipe bursting

2007· article· en· W1976296481 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Brian Lapos, R.W.I. Brachman, Ian D. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Geotechnical Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHigh-density polyethyleneGeotechnical engineeringMaterials scienceOverburden pressurePolyethyleneGeologyPipeComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements of vertical and horizontal pipe deflections are reported for a high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe experiencing an increase in vertical pressure after being pulled in place using pipe bursting techniques. Three tests were conducted to measure the diameter change of a 165 mm outside diameter HDPE pipe after replacing an intact clay pipe with an external diameter of 184 mm backfilled with a poorly graded dense sand. A fourth test measured the response of the HDPE pipe after replacing an intact clay pipe with an external diameter of 128 mm. Variable pipe deflections were measured in each test, which depended on the interactions among the broken clay pipe fragments surrounding the HDPE pipe. The orientation of the clay fragments controls whether the increase in vertical pressure is transferred immediately to the HDPE pipe. In some cases, the fractured clay pipe produced a structural ring encasing the HDPE pipe, thus providing additional hoop strength. Two of the replacement tests did not record diameter changes until 100 kPa because of the interaction amongst the clay fragments. The upsize test and one replacement test recorded diameter changes from a vertical pressure of 20 kPa, because there were no interactions observed among the clay fragments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Geotechnical Journal→Same topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures→French-language works237,207→