MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clonal Neural Stem Cells from Human Embryonic Stem Cell Colonies

2012· article· en· W1976338715 on OpenAlexafffund
Radha Chaddah, Margot E. Arntfield, S. I. C. Runciman, Laura Clarke, Derek van der Kooy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsTD Bank GroupUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKrembil FoundationOntario Ministry of Economic Development and InnovationMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoStem Cell Network
KeywordsEmbryonic stem cellNeural stem cellStem cellBiologyCell biologyNeurosphereAdult stem cellNeuroscienceGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clonal cell culture is crucial for experimental protocols that require growth or selection of pure populations of cells. High-density derivation of neural progenitors from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) can lead to incomplete differentiation, and transplantation of resulting heterogeneous cell mixtures can cause proliferation of tumorigenic clusters in vivo. We have identified the neural precursor that resides among normal hESC colonies as a TRA-1-60(-)/SSEA4(-)/SOX1(+) cell and developed a method that allows for the clonal expansion of these FACS-selected progenitors to neural stem cells (NSCs) in serum-free conditions. Single TRA-1-60(-)/SSEA4(-)/SOX1(+) cells grown in serum-free media give rise to multipotent NSCs with an efficiency of 0.7%. The fate of the TRA-1-60(-)/SSEA4(-)/SOX1(+) neural precursor becomes specified in maintenance conditions by inhibition of BMP signaling. This clonal culture method can be scaled up to produce NSCs for differentiation and use in cell therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.508

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207