MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976352106 · doi:10.1002/adhm.201370036

Cancer Therapy: Gold Nanoparticle‐Loaded Neural Stem Cells for Photothermal Ablation of Cancer (Adv. Healthcare Mater. 7/2013)

2013· article· en· W1976352106 on OpenAlexaff
Kenna Schnarr, Rachael Mooney, Yiming Weng, Donghong Zhao, Elizabeth Garcia, Brian Armstrong, Alexander J. Annala, Seung Up Kim, Karen S. Aboody, Jacob M. Berlin

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Healthcare Materials · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotothermal therapyNanorodMaterials scienceCancerCancer cellNeural stem cellLaser ablationNanotechnologyStem cellCancer stem cellColloidal goldNanoparticleBiomedical engineeringCancer researchMedicineLaserCell biologyInternal medicineOpticsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neural stem cells carrying internalized gold nanorods home in on cancer. Stimulating the nanorods with a near infrared laser causes them to heat up and kill surrounding cancer cells. The laser alone is non-harmful so cell killing only occurs where the stem cells have taken the nanorods. Further details can be found in the article by Jacob M. Berlin, Karen S. Aboody, and co-workers on page 976.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Healthcare MaterialsSame topicPhotoreceptor and optogenetics researchFrench-language works237,207