MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976358930 · doi:10.1081/sqa-120022086

A New Class of Distribution-Free Tests for Location Parameters

2003· article· en· W1976358930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSequential Analysis · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsStatisticsHomogeneity (statistics)Wilcoxon signed-rank testLocation parameterStatistical hypothesis testingClass (philosophy)Sample (material)Nonparametric statisticsProbability distributionMann–Whitney U testComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new class of distribution-free tests for the two-sample location problem is proposed. The tests are based on two-sample U-statistics. This class basically generalizes the tests proposed by Deshpande, J.V.; Kochar, S.C. Some competitors of Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test for location alternatives. Journal of Indian Statistical Association 1982, 19, 9–18. The proposed class of tests is also extended to the k (≥ 2)-sample problem for testing homogeneity of location parameters against ordered alternatives. This extension is based on linear combinations of two-sample U-statistics. Pitman asymptotic relative efficiencies (AREs) of the members of the proposed class(es) of tests relative to some of the existing tests are computed for a number of underlying distributions. It is shown that the proposed class of tests performs as good as or better than its competitors in literature.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.875
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it