MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976359337 · doi:10.3109/14992020309101316

Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos

2003· review· es· W1976359337 on OpenAlexaff
Terence W. Picton, M. Sasha John, Andrew Dimitrijevic, David W. Purcell

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Audiology · 2003
Typereview
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsBaycrest HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAudiologyBrainstemAuditory stimuliAuditory brainstem responseArousalIntensity (physics)ElectroencephalographyScalpPsychologyMedicineNeurosciencePhysicsHearing lossAnatomyPerception

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steady-state evoked potentials can be recorded from the human scalp in response to auditory stimuli presented at rates between 1 and 200 Hz or by periodic modulations of the amplitude and/or frequency of a continuous tone. Responses can be objectively detected using frequency-based analyses. In waking subjects, the responses are particularly prominent at rates near 40 Hz. Responses evoked by more rapidly presented stimuli are less affected by changes in arousal and can be evoked by multiple simultaneous stimuli without significant loss of amplitude. Response amplitude increases as the depth of modulation or the intensity increases. The phase delay of the response increases as the intensity or the carrier frequency decreases. Auditory steady-state responses are generated throughout the auditory nervous system, with cortical regions contributing more than brainstem generators to responses at lower modulation frequencies. These responses are useful for objectively evaluating auditory thresholds, assessing suprathreshold hearing, and monitoring the state of arousal during anesthesia.Los potenciales evocados de estado estable pueden registrarse del cráneo humano en respuesta a estímulos auditivos presentados a tasas de 1 y 200 Hz o por modulaciones periódicas de la amplitud y/o de la frecuencia de un tono continue Las respuestas pueden ser detectadas objetivamente por medio de un análisis frecuencial En sujetos en estado de alerta las respuestas son particularmente prominentes con tasas de estimulación cercanas a 40 Hz. Las respuestas evocadas por estímulos presentados a tasa más rápida resultan menos afectadas por cambios del estado de conciencia y pueden ser evocados por estímulos múltiples simultáneos sin una pérdida significativa de la amplitud. La amplitud de la respuesta aumenta conforme la profundidad de la modulación o de la intensidad aumenta. El retraso de fase de la respuesta aumenta conforme la intensidad de la frecuencia portadora aumenta. Las respuestas auditivas de estado estable se generan a todo lo largo del sistema nervioso auditivo; las regiones corticales contribuyen más que los generadores del tallo cerebral en las respuestas de frecuencias más bajas. Estas respuestas son útiles para evaluar objetivamente los umbrales de audición y permiten también evaluar la audición supraliminar y monitorizar el estado de conciencia durante la anestesia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations875
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of AudiologySame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207