MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976397894 · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12105

Possible influences of plasticity and genetic/maternal effects on species coexistence: native<i><scp>G</scp>ammarus fasciatus</i>facing exotic amphipods

2013· article· en· W1976397894 on OpenAlexafffund
Alison M. Derry, Åsa M. Kestrup, Andrew P. Hendry

Bibliographic record

VenueFunctional Ecology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsBiologyIntroduced speciesInvasive speciesEcologyHabitatPhenotypic plasticityFecundityZoologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Native species might be able to persist in the face of a detrimental exotic invader by occupying refuge habitats where the exotic is not successful. These refuges might then provide demographic subsidies that enhance persistence of the native species in areas of coexistence with the exotic species. Phenotypic plasticity of the native species could play a critical role in this process by allowing individuals dispersing from refuge to invaded habitats to adaptively modify their phenotypes, thereby enhancing the subsidy. By contrast, locally adapted genetic or maternal differences between native populations could result in fitness disadvantages for dispersers at invaded habitats, thereby reducing the subsidy. We studied phenotypic variation in a native amphipod (Gammarus fasciatus) across ion gradients inLacSt.Louis,Québec,Canada. Ion gradients determine refuge vs. invaded habitats because native amphipods are found in both ion‐poor and ion‐rich habitats, whereas exotic (Echinogammarus ischnus) amphipods are found only in the latter. We tested for plastic vs. genetic/maternal contributions to spatial variation (ion‐rich vs. ion‐poor habitats) in native amphipod fitness components: postmoult calcification, body size, larval survival, time to first reproduction and fecundity. We did so by comparing the following: (i) F0(collected from the wild) individuals between the two habitats – some of which were reared for a time under varying conditions in the laboratory; and (ii) F1(reared in the laboratory for their entire lives) individuals from the two habitats under a variety of water conditions. We found strong plastic effects on postmoult calcification – it was more rapid in ion‐rich water. We found genetic/maternal differences in time to reproduction (almost twice as long in ion‐poor amphipods), fecundity and larval survival (higher in ion‐poor amphipods) in early summer. These plastic effects and genetic/maternal differences are likely to be adaptive. Plasticity and genetic/maternal effects both could influence the efficacy of ion‐poor populations in providing demographic subsidies that aid native persistence at ion‐rich habitats where exotic amphipods are present. These effects could thus have important consequences for native species persistence in the presence of non‐native species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFunctional EcologySame topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFrench-language works237,207