MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976399398 · doi:10.3917/napo.141.0025

Le texte des Adieux de Fontainebleau

2014· article· fr· W1976399398 on OpenAlexaff
Thierry Lentz

Bibliographic record

VenueNapoleonica La Revue · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsCentre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Montagne
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Réfugié au château de Fontainebleau après la prise de Paris (31 mars 1814), Napoléon ne parvint pas à sauver son Empire, pas plus que le trône du roi de Rome. Il se résolut à abdiquer sans conditions le 6 avril 1814, décision qui devint effective après la signature du traité dit « de Fontainebleau » du 11. Après plusieurs jours de tergiversations et de préparation de son départ pour l’île d’Elbe, dont la souveraineté lui avait été octroyée, l’empereur prit le chemin de l’exil le 20 avril. Avant de monter en voiture, il s’adressa une dernière fois aux dernières troupes restées auprès de lui, soit le Ier régiment des grenadiers de la Garde auquel s’étaient joints une soixantaine d’élèves de l’École polytechnique qui avaient participé vingt jours plus tôt à la défense de la capitale. Les dernières paroles qu’il leur adressa furent improvisées et on n’en connaît pas vraiment le texte, sinon de deuxième main. Que leur dit-il vraiment ? C’est ce que cette note va tenter d’approcher.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNapoleonica La RevueSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207