MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976403055 · doi:10.4138/atlgeol.2009.002

Insights into the Acadian orogeny, New England Appalachians: a provenance study of the Carrabassett and Kittery formations, Maine

2009· article· en· W1976403055 on OpenAlex
Michael J. Dorais, Robert P. Wintsch, Wendy R. Nelson, M. Tubrett

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueAtlantic Geology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersDivision of Mathematical SciencesBrigham Young UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsOrogenyGeologyLaurentiaPaleocurrentProvenancePaleontologyPassive marginDevonianTrough (economics)Structural basinFelsicOrdovicianGeochemistryClastic rockRiftMafic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Central Maine Basin and Merrimack Trough are Silurian basins that formed adjacent to or were accreted to the Laurentian margin during the Acadian orogeny. The Early Devonian Carrabassett Formation of the Central Maine Basin and the Kittery Formation of the Merrimack Trough have major and trace element compositions indicative of a passive continental margin provenance, not unlike the older formations of the Central Maine Basin that are thought to have been derived from Laurentian sources. However, both the Carrabassett and Kittery formations have paleocurrent indicators of outboard sources. The Carrabassett Formation is one of the youngest formations of the Central Maine Basin and was deposited just prior to the Acadian orogeny. The Carrabassett and Kittery formations have major and trace element concentrations suggestive of passive margin turbidites derived from intermediate to felsic sources, inconsistent with a juvenile Avalonian provenance. The Carrabassett Formation contains detrital zircon grains that match the ages of peri-Gondwanan Ganderia. Unlike the dominance of positive bulk-rock εNd values that are characteristic of Avalonia, Ganderia has negative εNd values that are a better match for the negative εNd values of the Carrabassett and Kittery formations. However, Ganderia accreted to Laurentia during the Salinic orogeny, prior to the deposition of the Carrabassett Formation, and was basement to the sediments of the Central Maine Basin upon which the Carrabassett and other formations were deposited. Wedging of Ganderia by Avalonia during the initial stages of the Acadian orogeny may have uplifted Ganderia, forming highlands outboard of the Central Maine Basin that served as the source of the Carrabassett Formation sediments.
 
 RÉSUMÉ
 
 Le bassin central du Maine et la cuvette de Merrimack constituent des bassins siluriens s’étant formés le long de la marge laurentienne ou s’y étant accrétés au cours de l’orogenèse acadienne. La Formation du Dévonien précoce de Carrabassett, dans le bassin central du Maine, et la Formation de Kittery, de la cuvette de Merrimack, présentent des compositions en éléments majeurs et traces signalant une provenance d’une marge continentale passive, à l’instar des formations plus âgées du bassin central du Maine qu’on pense originaires de sources laurentiennes. Les formations de Carrabassett et de Kittery comportent toutefois des indicateurs de paléocourants de sources extérieures. La Formation de Carrabassett constitue l’une des formations les plus récentes du bassin central du Maine; elle s’est mise en place juste avant l’orogenèse acadienne. Les caractéristiques géochimiques et géochronologique des formations de Carrabassett et de Kittery pourraient par conséquent permettre l’identification du terrane de collision. Les formations de Carrabassett et de Kittery possèdent des concentrations d’éléments majeurs et traces évoquant les turbidites de marge passive en provenance de sources intermédiaires à felsiques, ce qui est contradictoire avec une origine avalonienne juvénile. La Formation de Carrabassett comporte des grains détritiques de zircon correspondant aux âges du Ganderia périgondwanien. Contrairement à la prédominance de concentrations εNd positives de roche en vrac caractéristiques d’Avalonia, Ganderia présentent des concentrations εNd négatives qui cadrent mieux avec les concentrations εNd négatives des formations de Carrabassett et de Kittery. Ganderia s’est toutefois accrété à Laurentia au cours de l’orogenèse salinique, avant le dépôt de la Formation de Carrabassett, et il a constitué le socle des sédiments du bassin central du Maine sur lesquels Carrabassett et d’autres formations se sont déposées. L’enfoncement d’Avalonia sous Ganderia au cours des stades initiaux de l’orogenèse acadienne pourrait avoir soulevé Ganderia, formant un massif à l’extérieur du bassin central du Maine qui a servi de source aux sédiments de la Formation de Carrabassett. [Traduit par la redaction]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it