MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976417060 · doi:10.1117/12.689157

A method for downscaling MODIS land channels to 250-m spatial resolution using adaptive regression and normalization

2006· article· en· W1976417060 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Alexander P. Trishchenko, Yi Luo, Konstantin Khlopenkov

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNatural Resources CanadaNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsDownscalingImage resolutionRemote sensingModerate-resolution imaging spectroradiometerNormalization (sociology)Environmental scienceLinear regressionRegressionSpectral bandsComputer scienceGeologySatelliteMeteorologyMathematicsGeographyPhysicsArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A method is proposed to derive spatially enhanced imagery for all seven Moderate Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) land spectral bands at 250 m spatial resolution. Originally, only bands B1 and B2 [visible (VIS) at 0.65 μm, and near-infrared (NIR) at 0.85 μm] are available from MODIS at 250 m spatial resolution. The remaining five land channels (bands B3 to B7) are observed at 500 m resolution. The adaptive regression is constructed for each individual MODIS L1B granule of 500 m spatial resolution by splitting the area into smaller blocks and generating nonlinear regression between bands B3 to B7 and B1, B2 and NDVI. Once a set of regression coefficients is generated based on 500 m image, it is then applied to 250 m data containing only channels B1 and B2 to produce five intermediate synthetic channels (B3 to B7) at 250 m spatial resolution. The final step involves normalizing the generated 250 m images to original 500 m images to preserve radiometric consistency. It is achieved in two stages and ensures that downscaled results are unbiased relative to original observations. The developed method was applied to generate Canada-wide clear-sky composites containing all seven MODIS land spectral channels at 250 m spatial resolution over the area of North America 5700 km by 4800 km.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicCalibration and Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207