Teleoperation of AZIMUT-3, an omnidirectional non-holonomic platform with steerable wheels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AZIMUT-3 is an omnidirectional non-holonomic (or pseudo-omnidirectional) robotic platform intended for safe human-robot interaction. In its wheeled configuration, shown in Fig. 1, AZIMUT-3 uses eight actuators for locomotion: four for propulsion and four for steering the wheels, which can rotate 180 degrees around their steering axis. Propulsion is done using standard DC brushless motors (Bayside K064050-3Y) with optical encoders (US Digital E4-300-157-HUB, 0.3 deg of resolution), capable of reaching 1.47 m/s. The platform uses steerable wheels motorized using differential elastic actuators (DEA), which provide compliance, safety and torque control capabilities. AZIMUT-3's hardware architecture consists of distributed modules for sensing and low-level control, communicating with each other through a 1 Mbps CAN bus. A Mini-ITX computer equipped with a 2.0 GHz Core 2 duo processor running Linux with real-time patches (RT-PREEMPT) is used on-board for high-level control modules. Nickel-metal hydride batteries provide power to the platform for up to 3 hours of autonomy. A passive vertical suspension mechanism (Rosta springs) is used to connect the wheels to AZIMUT-3's chassis, allowing them to keep contact with the ground on uneven surfaces. The platform has a 34 kg payload capacity and weights 35 kg.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".