Sumatriptan elicits both constriction and dilation in human and bovine brain intracortical arterioles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Little is known about serotonin (5-HT) receptors present on brain microvessels that are innervated by brainstem serotonergic neurons. Using 5-HT, sumatriptan and subtype selective 5-HT(1) receptor agonists and/or the 5-HT(1) receptor antagonist GR127935, we characterized the 5-HT receptors involved in regulating microvascular tone of pressurized intracortical arterioles (approximately 40--50 microm) isolated from human and bovine cerebral cortex. The role of nitric oxide (NO) on these responses was assessed with the N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine (L-NNA, 10(-5) M), an inhibitor of NO synthesis. Bovine pial arteries were studied for comparative purposes. 2. At spontaneous tone, 5-HT induced a dose-dependent constriction of human and bovine microarteries (respective pD(2) values of 7.3+/-0.2 and 6.9+/-0.1); a response potently inhibited by GR127935 (pIC(50) value of 8.5+/-0.1) in bovine microvessels. 3. In both species, the 5-HT(1) receptor agonist sumatriptan induced a biphasic response consisting of a small but significant dilation at low concentrations (1 and/or 10 nM) followed by a constriction at higher doses (pD(2) for contraction of 6.9+/-0.1 and 6.6+/-0.2 in human and bovine vessels, respectively). Pre-incubation with L-NNA abolished the sumatriptan-induced dilation and significantly shifted the dose-response of the constriction curve to the left. In contrast, the selective 5-HT(1D) (PNU-109291) and 5-HT(1F) (LY344864) receptor agonists were devoid of any vasomotor effect. 4. In bovine pial vessels, 5-HT and sumatriptan elicited potent constrictions (respective pD(2) of 7.2+/-0.1 and 6.6+/-0.1), a weak dilation being occasionally observed at low sumatriptan concentrations. 5. A significant negative correlation was observed between pial and intracortical vessels diameter and the extent of the dilatory response to 10(-9) M sumatriptan. Together, these results indicate that sumatriptan, most likely via activation of distinctly localized microvascular 5-HT(1B) receptors, can induce a constriction and/or a dilation which is sensitive to inhibition of NO synthesis and dependent on the size and, possibly, the existing tone of the vessels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".