Effects of vibration in inline skating on the Hoffmann reflex, force, and proprioception.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to examine the effects of vibrations induced by inline skating on the Hoffmann (H) reflex, maximal voluntary isometric (MVC) force, and ankle proprioception. METHODS: Accelerometers were used to measure the frequencies and amplitudes of the vibrations encountered at the skate and mid-tibia levels. The soleus H reflex was recorded before and after (for 30 min) inline skating for 30 min. Maximal plantarflexor contractions were performed against a strain gauge while EMG was recorded from the soleus and medial gastrocnemius muscles. An ankle position-matching test was carried out to measure proprioception at the ankle. A Modified Borg Scale was used to obtain the appreciation of leg numbness and fatigue during inline skating. RESULTS: The vibrations measured at the skate chassis level had a mean frequency of 141.8 +/- 25.2 Hz and an amplitude of </=5 g. These vibrations were transmitted to the lower limb as measured by a mean frequency of 34.4 +/- 27.7 Hz and an amplitude of </=2 g at the mid-tibia level. The results demonstrate a clear inhibition ( approximately 35%) of the H reflex after skating that persisted for >35 min after skating. A 10% drop in MVC plantarflexor force was observed after inline skating. There was no accompanying change in EMG signal parameters. The ankle proprioception of the subjects decreased after skating, resulting in reproduction errors twice as large as before skating. CONCLUSION: Vibrations encountered during inline skating resulted in modifications of neuromotor functions related to the muscle spindles' primary afferent. These changes may partially be explained by presynaptic inhibition; however, a more plausible mechanism may be a decrease in the Ia afferent transmission induced by the vibration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".