MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976436569 · doi:10.1080/17480930802351479

A framework for realistic microscopic modelling of surface mining transportation systems

2008· article· en· W1976436569 on OpenAlexaff
Amel Jaoua, Diane Riopel, Michel Gamache

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mining Reclamation and Environment · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalGroup for Research in Decision Analysis
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckSoftware deploymentComputer scienceFuel efficiencyRoad surfaceTraffic simulationIntelligent transportation systemTransport engineeringSimulationSystems engineeringEngineeringAutomotive engineeringCivil engineeringMicrosimulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a recently developed realistic microscopic simulator for surface mining transportation systems called Surface Mining Transportation Simulator (SuMiTSim). In the road transport sector recent researches proved that for proper deployment of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), the use of microscopic simulation models rather than the conventional macroscopic ones is critical. Microscopic simulators emulate realistically the dynamic traffic on a road network. A conceptual framework for the development of a surface mining micro-simulator is then proposed. The implementation of this framework led to SuMiTSim which is a robust tool for truck traffic analysis and control. Two case studies have been conducted. The results obtained from the first case study show clearly the benefits that can be derived when using SuMiTSim as a laboratory for more efficient haul roads design. The second finding concerns the integration of SuMiTSim as a proactive updater for real-time allocation. Other potential uses of SuMiTSim are highlighted, such as for sound environmental management through controlling fuel consumption and reducing truck bunching effects on mine networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mining Reclamation and EnvironmentSame topicTraffic control and managementFrench-language works237,207