Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Au cours de la seconde moitié du XX e siècle, l’analyse musicale s’est tournée vers les modèles linguistiques d’inspiration structuraliste pour tenter de renouveler et de rendre plus explicites les méthodes traditionnelles. Dans cet article, qui est à la fois une bibliographie critique et un bilan épistémologique, Jean-Jacques Nattiez examine dans quel contexte musicologie et linguistique se sont rencontrées. Il présente tour à tour les applications du modèle phonologique, du modèle paradigmatique (avec une discussion des propositions et de la postérité de Ruwet) et les diverses grammaires musicales descriptives d’inspiration génératives qui ont été proposées. Il examine aussi bien les travaux qui portent sur la musique occidentale que sur les répertoires qu’étudient l’ethnomusicologie et les spécialistes de musique populaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.105 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it