MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1976474330 · doi:10.1086/378947

A New Distance Technique for Galactic Plane Objects

2003· article· en· W1976474330 on OpenAlexaffabout
T. Foster, D. Routledge

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsGalactic planeAstronomyAstrophysicsPlane (geometry)GalaxyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new method based on H I column densities for determination of distances within the disk of the Galaxy. The technique is useful for all Galactic plane objects, including H II regions and supernova remnants (SNRs), provided a line-of-sight velocity can be assigned to the object. Our method uses 21 cm spectral-line data to find the atomic hydrogen column density to an object, and beyond it to the Galactic edge. A model of the smooth large-scale Galactic distribution of H I material seen in emission (which principally traces the smooth structure of the Galaxy) is constructed. Our model accounts for scale-height flaring with increasing Galactocentric radius and includes the Galactic warp, which is prominent in the first and second quadrants of the Galaxy. The model's ability to trace the observed distribution of H I is demonstrated on lines of sight toward SNR DA 530 (l = 933, b = 7°) and H II region Sh 121 (l = 902, b = 17). We then apply the new technique to 29 Sharpless H II regions with known photometric distances across the second quadrant. We measure line-of-sight velocities for the H II regions from associated 12CO emission, using 1' resolution 12CO (J = 1-0) data from the Canadian Galactic Plane Survey. Our distance method yields distances to these objects that are consistent with their photometric distances and which are markedly smaller than the kinematic distances found from a flat Galactic rotation curve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→