Strong‐field dressing of vibrational manifolds within ultrafast coherent Raman excitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The mechanism of ultrafast, coherent Raman transitions driven at high field strengths is explored in theory and experiment. The study addresses the possibility of maintaining control of a vibrational wavepacket that is guided to a desired final state during the course of a Raman excitation by significantly perturbing the participating molecular states on the time scale of the dynamics under manipulation. Variations in the sequence and amplitude of the pulsed laser fields give direct insight into the nature of the perturbation as well as the population flow within vibrational manifolds of the electronic states involved in the transition. The excitation scheme realized in this work demonstrates control over the dynamics of a molecular system through a non‐adiabatic pathway that utilizes the full manifold of dressed states induced by the laser fields driving the transition rather than isolating the system in a decoupled dressed state common for the adiabatic passage scheme. By preparing highly excited virbrational states in molecular iodine with this scheme, it is shown that a vibrational wavepacket can be steered by controlling the phase with which the character of the field‐free states is introduced into the manifold of dressed states participating in the transition. This scheme seeks to open the possibility of using ultrafast Raman excitation for initiating and observing chemical reactions in the electronic ground state of a molecular system. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".