MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976543968 · doi:10.1007/s11746-006-1208-9

Comparison of the frying stability of regular and high‐oleic acid sunflower oils

2006· article· en· W1976543968 on OpenAlexaff
Laurence Le Normand, N.A.M. Eskin, Roman Przybylski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicEdible Oils Quality and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of LethbridgeUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSunflower oilSunflowerOleic acidComposition (language)ChemistryFood scienceDegradation (telecommunications)HorticultureBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The frying stability of a regular sunflower oil (RSFO) was compared with that of a high‐oleic acid sunflower oil (HOSFO). The rate of FFA formation was greater for HOSFO than RSFO during 72 h of frying. The content of tocopherols was much higher in RSFO and their degradation was markedly slower than that observed for HOSFO. The formation of total polar compounds, however, was similar for both oils despite the dramatic differences in FA composition. This study further confirms the limitations in predicting frying stability based solely on the FA composition and is consistent with earlier studies conducted in our laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score0.420

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicEdible Oils Quality and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207