De la diffraction des groupes internes à la reconstruction d’imagos familiales
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’adolescent en souffrance rejoue et diffracte sur l’institution des modalités de liens spécifiques à sa famille interne. Si l’on considère que les groupes internes désignent des schèmes de relations d’objet intériorisés, inhérentes au groupe primaire, l’on peut alors considérer que les groupes externes peuvent être utilisés comme autant de scènes qui permettent de les réactiver. La prise en compte de la manière dont l’adolescent entre en lien avec l’institution pourra éclairer le soignant sur la manière dont il signifie son mal-être en deçà des mots, et dont il rejoue des liens familiaux anciens. Mailler des liens autour de l’adolescent, sur le mode d’une enveloppe familiale contenante, lui permet de reconstruire des imagos familiales satisfaisantes et peu à peu de se différencier et de s’individuer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".