MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976576852 · doi:10.1080/07060660309507071

Distribution of<i>Phoma sclerotioides</i>and incidence of brown root rot of alfalfa in Wyoming, U.S.A.

2003· article· en· W1976576852 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
C. R. Hollingsworth, F. A. Gray, D. W. Koch, R. W. Groose, T. E. Heald

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Pathology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Disease Resistance and Genetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhomaBiologyRoot rotTaprootIncidence (geometry)Distribution (mathematics)PathogenHorticultureVeterinary medicineAgronomyBotanyMedicineMathematicsMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brown root rot of alfalfa, caused by Phoma sclerotioides, has been reported from Alberta and Saskatchewan, Canada, and was the cause of widespread “winterkill” of alfalfa in southwestern Wyoming, U.S.A., in 1996. Affected plants exhibit characteristic dark, sunken, necrotic lesions on upper tap and lateral roots. Surveys of irrigated fields were conducted in nine counties to determine distribution of the pathogen within Wyoming. Symptomatic as well as asymptomatic root-tissue isolations demonstrated that P. sclerotioides was present in most counties surveyed, indicating its distribution may be statewide. Disease incidence was assessed in two fields where P. sclerotioides occurred. Results indicate that the pathogen is uniformly distributed within infested fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.789

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant PathologySame topicPlant Disease Resistance and GeneticsFrench-language works237,207