MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976580313 · doi:10.1142/s0218194000000183

KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING OF A MONITORING AND CONTROL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM

2000· article· en· W1976580313 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExpert systemComputer scienceDecision support systemSoftware engineeringConceptual modelObject-oriented programmingHeuristicsKnowledge-based systemsLegal expert systemKnowledge engineeringSystems engineeringEngineeringKnowledge managementArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the Object-Oriented Knowledge Engineering (OOKE) methodology and its application in developing an expert system. OOKE is an expert system development methodology which incorporates the conceptual modelling tool of Inferential Modelling Technique into the analysis model of the Object-Oriented Software Engineering methodology. It was applied to develop a supervisory and decision support system for monitor and control of a water distribution system called the Water Advisor. The expertise, heuristics and reasoning knowledge of experts were acquired and then formulated in a model building process using the OOKE into a conceptual model which became the basis for a prototype expert system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.682
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it