Levator claviculae muscle discovered during physical examination for cervical lymphadenopathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During a routine physical examination of an adult female with a history of breast cancer and cervical lymphadenopathy, a mass was noted in the right supraclavicular region. The mass was unilateral and easily palpable along the superior border near the median aspect of the clavicle. Plain film radiography, performed to determine whether the mass represented an enlarged jugulo-omohyoid lymph node, revealed an elongated opaque mass in this region. Computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images were subsequently obtained. Sequential axial CT scans revealed a cylindrical mass that appeared to be independent of contiguous muscles, including the sternocleidomastoid, anterior, and middle scalene muscles. This mass attached inferiorly to the clavicle and superiorly to the transverse process of the sixth cervical vertebra. Sagittal, coronal, and axial MR scans confirmed the presence of a well-defined superficial mass. It is concluded that the mass represents a levator claviculae (cleidocervical) muscle. This observation underscores the importance of understanding soft tissue variants that may be encountered during a routine physical examination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".