MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976600381 · doi:10.1103/physreve.64.066411

Temperature relaxation in two-temperature states of dense electron-ion systems

2001· article· en· W1976600381 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOptical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonElectronPhysicsRelaxation (psychology)Atomic physicsExcitationCoupling (piping)PlasmaLandau dampingCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is shown that the Landau-Spitzer theory for temperature relaxation between electrons and ions, which was originally derived for ideal plasmas, is in fact more general. A relaxation formula is derived, for arbitrary ion-ion coupling that follows from elementary considerations combined with the fluctuation-dissipation theorem and the f-sum rule. The conditions for the validity of this theory are weak electron-ion coupling and that the spectrum of fluctuations of the ions lies at energies far below the resonances of the electrons spectrum. It is found that the rate of energy relaxation is not sensitive to the details of the ion-excitation spectrum. For classical electrons the formula reduces to the Landau-Spitzer form with minor modifications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it