MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976601254 · doi:10.1029/2006gl029063

Magnetic phases in hemo‐ilmenite: Insight from low‐velocity and high‐field Mössbauer spectroscopy

2007· article· en· W1976601254 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cathrine Frandsen, Steen Mørup, S. A. McEnroe, Phillip J. Robinson, F. Langenhorst

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicIron oxide chemistry and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIlmeniteHematiteMössbauer spectroscopyFerrimagnetismStoichiometryMaterials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)MineralogySpectroscopyGeologyCrystallographyChemistryMagnetic fieldEnvironmental chemistryMagnetizationPhysicsPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have studied natural samples of hemo‐ilmenite (ilmenite with hematite exsolution lamellae) by use of Mössbauer spectroscopy. The samples are from the Allard Lake intrusion in Quebec. The stoichiometric compositions of the ilmenite host and the hematite lamellae are approximately Fe2+0.84Mg2+0.14Ti4+0.98Fe3+0.04O3 and Fe2+0.17Mg2+0.01Ti4+0.18Fe3+1.64O3, respectively. From low‐velocity Mössbauer measurements, the Fe2+ and Fe3+ components of the Fe2+‐substituted hematite and Fe3+‐substituted ilmenite, formed by incomplete exsolution of hematite and ilmenite, have been suggested identified. High‐field Mössbauer measurements, obtained at low‐temperature, indicate the presence of a minor ferrimagnetic component.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicIron oxide chemistry and applicationsFrench-language works237,207