La part mimétique des dynamiques de cognition sociale : clé pour penser l’auto-tranformation du social
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Certains scientifiques, sociologues ou économistes en particulier, se sont récemment emparés du terme de cognition sociale utilisé en psychologie en lui donnant un second sens, à savoir, une cognition distribuée sur l’ensemble des individus composant une société. L’enjeu est alors de savoir « en quoi les aptitudes sociales humaines rendent compte du développement d’une cognition collective complexe ». Nous défendons ici l’idée que la cognition sociale est un raffinement du concept de cognition distribuée plutôt qu’un équivalent. C’est un phénomène propre aux sociétés humaines qui permet de penser leur propriété d’auto-transformation. Nous montrons comment l’imitation permet de penser ce phénomène, comme le suggérait en son temps Gabriel Tarde.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".