MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976627961 · doi:10.1177/1473325012464805

A Space for Stories: Revisiting relational poetry as inquiry on everyday practice

2013· article· en· W1976627961 on OpenAlexaff
Karen Gold

Bibliographic record

VenueQualitative Social Work · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicCounseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoetrySociologyMeaning (existential)Space (punctuation)Strict constructionismEpistemologyRelational theorySocial constructionismAestheticsLinguisticsSocial sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article I build on Stanley Witkin’s ideas about ‘relational poetry’ to explore the meaning(s) of a clinical encounter. Drawing on social constructionist approaches to inquiry, and notions of the ‘relational-poetic’ which invite us to pay specific attention to resonance, I present a poetic dialogue between Ronna Bloom and myself. Reflecting on this process, I discuss the role of poetic writing in creating possibilities for new conversations on the everyday meanings of practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0110.103
Scholarly communication0.0180.032
Open science0.0030.013
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQualitative Social WorkSame topicCounseling, Therapy, and Family DynamicsFrench-language works237,207