Rheology studies of foam flow during injection mold filling
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This work studies the flow behavior of a developing two‐phase gas‐polymer suspension during injection into the instrumented mold cavity of an injection molding machine. In the experiments, blowing agent type and concentration were varied along with processing conditions, to generate controlled cell structures in two different polymers, low density polyethylene and thermoplastic polyolefin. Experimental results indicate that the rheological properties of two phase gas‐polymer suspensions were sensitive to shear rate, blowing agent concentration, melt temperature, and mold temperature. The viscosity of all gas‐polymer suspensions revealed a reduction compared with neat polymer melt in the presence of gas bubbles, because of the reduced volume fraction of polymer matrix. A two‐phase rheological model has been used for fitting with our experimental results for estimating the shear viscosity of two‐phase flow in the mold cavity of the injection molding machine. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 47:522–529, 2007. © 2007 Society of Plastics Engineers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it