Application of axisymmetric modelling to integrated LCT structure of series‐resonant converter
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The aim of this paper is to present a low‐cost solution for low‐power applications. A high‐frequency AC to DC converter respecting the EN 61000‐3‐2 standard and suitable for application in the power range of 300 W is presented. Its topology is based on a full‐bridge series‐resonant converter that operates below half the resonant frequency. The converter features zero‐current for both turn‐on and turn‐off and reduces the switching current for the output rectifier. These advantages make the series‐resonant topology suitable for operation at high frequency. A method for the design of an integrated LCT structure (Inductor–Capacitor–Transformer) is presented. Also, results of the application of a newly developed FEA (Finite Elements Analysis) formulation for the constructed LCT prototype are presented. It is shown that the necessary capacitance can be achieved by using a bifilar primary and the leakage inductance of the transformer replaces the physical inductor. Finally, two PFC (Power Factor Correction) series‐resonant converters, using integrated and discrete LCT, were built, tested and compared. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".