MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976660759 · doi:10.1063/1.1593214

Modeling of photonic crystals using a real-valued transmission line matrix method

2003· article· en· W1976660759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhotonic crystalTransmission lineBoundary value problemTransmission (telecommunications)Plane wave expansionMatrix (chemical analysis)Periodic boundary conditionsRepresentation (politics)Matrix representationReflection (computer programming)Frequency domainDomain (mathematical analysis)Boundary (topology)DielectricTransmission-line matrix methodNoise (video)Electric power transmissionPhysicsComputer scienceOpticsMathematical analysisMathematicsMaterials scienceComputational electromagneticsOptoelectronicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringElectrical engineeringElectromagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, we present a stable real-valued transmission line matrix (TLM) method for simulating periodic photonic structures. Unique to this method is the circuit-type implementation of the periodicity (Bloch) condition at the sidewalls of the unit cell under simulation. Unlike previously published methods for implementing periodic boundary conditions in real-valued TLM networks, our circuit representation is shown to be passive since no energy is introduced from the boundaries of the simulation domain. The enforcement of Bloch boundary conditions at the sidewalls of the simulation domain, while preserving energy, results in an unconditionally stable TLM method free of high-frequency noise. Our approach is validated by simulating a two-dimensional array of dielectric materials, a structure usually referred to as a photonic crystal. The results are compared with those obtained by the plane wave expansion method and good agreement is found.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.315
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it