MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976685335 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/17/6/319

Preconditioned all-at-once methods for large, sparse parameter estimation problems

2001· article· es· W1976685335 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2001
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHessian matrixMathematicsConjugate gradient methodDiscretizationApplied mathematicsNewton's methodMathematical optimizationMathematical analysisNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem of recovering a parameter function based on measurements of solutions of a system of partial differential equations in several space variables leads to a number of computational challenges. Upon discretization of a regularized formulation a large, sparse constrained optimization problem is obtained. Typically in the literature, the constraints are eliminated and the resulting unconstrained formulation is solved by some variant of Newton's method, usually the Gauss-Newton method. A preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm is applied at each iteration for the resulting reduced Hessian system. In this paper we apply instead a preconditioned Krylov method directly to the KKT system arising from a Newton-type method for the constrained formulation (an "all-at-once" approach). A variant of symmetric QMR is employed, and an effective preconditioner is obtained by solving the reduced Hessian system approximately. Since the reduced Hessian system presents significa...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it