MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976711443 · doi:10.1201/9781003067238-1

Solid-State NMR Studies of Zeolites and Related Systems

2020· book-chapter· en· W1976711443 on OpenAlexaff
Colin A. Fyfe, Κ. T. Mueller, G. T. Kokotailo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaCanadian Association of Nurses in Oncology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSolid-state nuclear magnetic resonanceState (computer science)Solid-stateMaterials scienceChemistryPhysical chemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceComputer sciencePhysicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, high-resolution solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy has emerged as a powerful complementary method to diffraction techniques for the investigation of zeolite molecular sieve structures. This chapter presents a description of the development of solid-state NMR as applied to zeolites and related systems, with particular emphasis on recent work and ongoing developments in the field. Although there has been some effort directed toward the study of adsorbed species and reactions of guest molecules within zeolite cavities, the chapter focuses its discussion on investigations of the molecular sieve frameworks themselves. It discusses the information regarding zeolite structure available through study of these nuclei and the interactions of their spins with local electric and magnetic fields. Zeolite ZSM-5 has the most complex unit cell of any zeolite system, and its structure represents a very demanding test of the reliability of these techniques, there being either 12 or 24 T-sites depending on the phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207