A new hybrid approach using the explicit dynamic finite element method and thermodynamic law for the analysis of the thermoforming and blow molding processes for polymer materials
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this work, the problem of the modeling of thermoforming and blow molding processes for viscoelastic sheet are considered. To take account of the enclosed gas volume, responsible for inflation of the thermoplastic membrane (which contributes significantly to the strength and stiffness of a thermoplastic structure), we considered thermodynamic approach to express external work in terms of a closed volume. The pressure load is thus deduced from the thermodynamic law of ideal gases. The viscoelastic behavior of the K‐BKZ model is considered. The Lagrangian formulation together with the assumption of the membrane theory is used in the explicit dynamic finite element implementation. The numerical validation is performed by comparing the theoretical bubble free inflation with numerical results. Moreover, the influence of the K‐BKZ constitutive model on the thickness and stress distribution in the thermoforming of containers is presented. POLYM. ENG. SCI., 46:1554–1564, 2006. © 2006 Society of Plastics Engineers
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".