F-actin-dependent Insolubility of Chromatin-modifying Components
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many complexes involved in chromatin modification are difficult to isolate and commonly found associated with nuclear matrix preparations. In this study, we examine the elution properties of chromatin-modifying components under different extraction conditions. We find that most, but not all, histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases predominantly partition with the nuclear pellet during intermediate salt extraction. In attempts to identify a biological basis for the observed insolubility, we demonstrate that depolymerizing cellular actin, but not cellular tubulin, mobilizes a significant proportion of the insoluble pool into the intermediate salt-soluble nuclear extract. The disruption of cellular F-actin releases a specific subset of high molecular weight, active, nuclear histone deacetylase complexes that are not found under normal conditions. This study demonstrates that actin polymerization, a physiologically relevant process, is responsible for the observed insolubility of these components during nuclear extract preparation and establishes a simple strategy for isolating subsets of chromatin-modifying complexes that are otherwise depleted or absent under the same extraction conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".