MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976749710 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m401805200

F-actin-dependent Insolubility of Chromatin-modifying Components

2004· article· en· W1976749710 on OpenAlexafffund
Christi Andrin, Michael J. Hendzel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation pour la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsChromatinHistoneAcetylationHistone AcetyltransferasesBiochemistryNuclear matrixChemistryActinBiophysicsBiologyDNACell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many complexes involved in chromatin modification are difficult to isolate and commonly found associated with nuclear matrix preparations. In this study, we examine the elution properties of chromatin-modifying components under different extraction conditions. We find that most, but not all, histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases predominantly partition with the nuclear pellet during intermediate salt extraction. In attempts to identify a biological basis for the observed insolubility, we demonstrate that depolymerizing cellular actin, but not cellular tubulin, mobilizes a significant proportion of the insoluble pool into the intermediate salt-soluble nuclear extract. The disruption of cellular F-actin releases a specific subset of high molecular weight, active, nuclear histone deacetylase complexes that are not found under normal conditions. This study demonstrates that actin polymerization, a physiologically relevant process, is responsible for the observed insolubility of these components during nuclear extract preparation and establishes a simple strategy for isolating subsets of chromatin-modifying complexes that are otherwise depleted or absent under the same extraction conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicHistone Deacetylase Inhibitors ResearchFrench-language works237,207