The effect of immunoglobulin immunoadsorptions on delayed xenograft rejection of human CD55 transgenic pig kidneys in baboons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Delayed xenograft rejection (DXR) remains a major obstacle in discordant xenotransplantation. As strategies of complement inhibition and xenogeneic natural antibody (Ab) removal have been shown to give prolonged xenograft survival, we endeavored to determine whether combining these two strategies would lead to an additive effect in terms of graft survival. The study was initiated with two groups, A and B, where group A received normal kidneys and group B received hCD55 transgenic kidneys. Both groups underwent pre-transplant (day-1) total immunoglobulin (Ig) immunoadsorption (IA) and received an immunosuppression of cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Two subsequent groups (C and D) receiving hCD55 transgenic pig kidneys were then performed with an 'optimized' immunosuppression (Cyclophosphamide starting 1 day earlier) but only group D recipients were immunoadsorbed. Biopsies taken during the post-transplantation period were analyzed for Ab deposition, compliment activation and cellular infiltration. No hyperacute rejection was observed. In the initial immunoadsorbed groups A and B, all baboons underwent DXR, which started surprisingly early (day 5 in most cases. In the subsequent two groups, the immunoadsorbed group D baboons also underwent DXR, again as early as day 5. In contrast, group C baboons did not show any signs of DXR on their day 6 biopsy or at their time of death. Analysis of graft biopsies from the kidneys undergoing rejection or with stable function showed strong deposition of anti-Gal IgM in all cases whereas strong complement C5b-9 deposits were only observed in biopsies at rejection. Cellular infiltration consisted mostly of monocytes/macrophages, was more pronounced in biopsies taken at rejection and was associated with a pro-inflammatory environment involving interleukins 1alpha, 6 and 8. Our findings suggest non-specific Ig (anti-Gal and non-Gal Ig of all isotypes) IA or even incomplete IA in immunosuppressed baboon recipients of transgenic pig kidneys is detrimental to graft survival by being associated with an Ab and compliment driven rejection. We speculate that the IA were insufficient in terms of Ig depletion or frequency inducing an Ab rebound or that this total Ig depletion also removed components facilitating graft survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".