Three-dimensional analysis of water infiltration into the Gouhou rockfill dam using saturatedunsaturated seepage theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Gouhou Dam was a concrete-faced rockfill dam built in a steep canyon that collapsed in 1993 due to internal erosion during the initial reservoir filling. In this paper, the process of water infiltration into the originally unsaturated rockfill dam is studied using three-dimensional saturatedunsaturated seepage theory. The three-dimensional characteristics of seepage through the dam bounded by steep abutments, the effect of material anisotropy, and the effect of rockfill stratifications are studied. The three-dimensional results are compared with those from two-dimensional analyses. The three-dimensional simulations show that seepage water flows faster and the hydraulic gradients are greater near the abutment boundary in the dam. As such, the evolution of the seepage failure in the three-dimensional cases is faster than that in the two-dimensional analyses, and the two-dimensional analyses will underestimate the risk of seepage failure, particularly near the abutment boundary. If the materials in the dam were uniform, the reservoir water would infiltrate into the dam along a downward flow path towards the riverbed, and not exit from the surface on the downstream slope. Increasing the horizontal coefficient of permeability of the rockfill increases the infiltration velocity, but the material anisotropy does not appreciably change the infiltration pattern. Stratifications in the rockfill, however, cause the seepage water to advance more quickly in the horizontal direction along the interface between the sandwich layer and the rockfill, thus increasing the possibility of seepage failure.Key words: seepage, seepage failure, rockfill dam, unsaturated soils, wetting front, numerical analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".