MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976805541 · doi:10.1109/iecon.2006.347275

Real Time Linear Control implementation Based on Experimentally Validated Small Signal Model of a Three-Phase Three-Level Boost-Type Vienna Rectifier

2006· article· en· W1976805541 on OpenAlexafffund
Nesrine Bel Haj Youssef, Kamal Al‐Haddad, Hadi Y. Kanaan

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsTotal harmonic distortionControl theory (sociology)Small-signal modelRectifier (neural networks)Power factorController (irrigation)Three-phaseDSPACEDigital controlElectronic engineeringMATLABHarmonicInductorComputer scienceVoltageEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, design and implementation of a new MIMO linear control technique based on theoretically established and experimentally validated small signal model for the three-phase three-level boost-type AC/DC Vienna converter is presented. The resulted transfer functions are discretized for sake of digital controllers design. Multiple-loop control strategy is adopted and consists of inner current feedback loops, based on the straightforward looping technique that neglects interactions between the dq components of respectively control inputs and currents, and of an outer voltage loop, designed to ensure DC voltage regulation by adjusting the magnitude of the references for the inner current loops. The proposed control approach IS first simulated, using SIMULINK of Matlab, and then validated on a 1.5 kW laboratory prototype supported by the DS 1104 digital real-time controller board of dSPACE. The obtained results prove that a judicious choice of controller parameters, as well as an adequate rating of boost inductors allow meeting the IEEE standards requirements in terms of AC line current total harmonic distortion (THD) and power factor (PF). The efficiency of the proposed control technique is maintained in case of disturbances occurring on both source and load sides

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics SocietySame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207