MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1976807679 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m607725200

Close Packing of Helices 3 and 12 of 16 S rRNA Is Required for the Normal Ribosome Function

2006· article· en· W1976807679 on OpenAlexafffund
Matthieu G. Gagnon, Alka Mukhopadhyay, Sergey V. Steinberg

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsRibosomeRibosomal RNATranslation (biology)CombinatoricsChemistryCrystallographyGeneticsBiologyComputational biologyMathematicsRNAMessenger RNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The along-groove packing motif is a quasi-reciprocal arrangement of two RNA double helices in which a backbone of each helix is closely packed within the minor groove of the other helix. At the center of the inter-helix contact, a GU base pair in one helix packs against a Watson-Crick base pair in the other helix. Here, based on in vivo selection from a combinatorial gene library of 16 S rRNA and on functional characterization of the selected clones, we demonstrate that the normal ribosome performance requires that helices 3 and 12 be closely packed. In some clones the Watson-Crick and GU base pairs exchange in their positions between the two helices, which affects neither the quality of the helix packing, nor the ribosome function. On the other hand, perturbations in the close packing usually lead to a substantial drop in the ribosome activity. The functionality of the clones containing such perturbations may depend on the presence of particular elements in the vicinity of the area of contact between helices 3 and 12. Such cases do not exist in natural 16 S rRNA, and their selection enriches our knowledge of the constraints imposed on the structure of ribosomal RNA in functional ribosomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological Chemistry→Same topicRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms→French-language works237,207→