Intrapartum Management of Severe Fetal Airway Obstruction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with the planned intrapartum management of fetuses with suspected severe airway obstruction. METHODS: Retrospective review of prenatal presentations, intrapartum airway procurement methods, outcomes, and complications. RESULTS: All cases (N = 11) at our tertiary airway referral institution between 1995 and 2002 were reviewed. Obstruction was secondary to giant cervicofacial lymphangiomas (5), teratomas (2), epignathis (1), epulis (1), conjoined fetus (1), and tracheal foreign body (1). Elective cesarean delivery of the entire fetus was performed while maintaining fetal-placental circulation as long as possible. We found it necessary to deliver the entire fetus to improve airway exposure and decrease maternal hemorrhage. The airway was secured effectively in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Although full cesarean delivery of the fetus significantly reduces fetal-placental circulation times, in comparison with the formal ex utero intrapartum treatment (EXIT) procedure, airway access is improved, maternal complications may be decreased, and high airway procurement success is still safely achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it