MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1976821846 · doi:10.1002/jmri.20795

Correlations between dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging–derived measures of tumor microvasculature and interstitial fluid pressure in patients with cervical cancer

2006· article· en· W1976821846 on OpenAlexaff
Masoom A. Haider, Igor Sitartchouk, Timothy P. L. Roberts, Anthony Fyles, Ali T Hashmi, Michael Milosevic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkMount Sinai Hospital
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineNuclear medicineExtracellular fluidDynamic contrastDynamic contrast-enhanced MRICorrelationIn vivoCervical cancerRadiologyCancerChemistryExtracellularInternal medicineMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To correlate permeability (rk(trans)), extracellular volume fraction (rv(e)), relative to muscle and initial area under the enhancement curve (IAUC(60m)) determined by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) with in vivo measurements of interstitial fluid pressure (IFP) in patients with cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI and IFP measurements were performed of cervical tumors of 32 patients prior to therapy. Median tumor rk(trans) and rv(e) were derived from a bidirectional two-compartment model using an input function derived from muscle. Median IAUC(60m) was defined as the integral of tumor enhancement in the first 60 seconds divided by the similar muscle enhancement integral. These parameters were correlated with the mean tumor IFP. RESULTS: There was a significant negative correlation between IAUC(60m) and IFP (r = -0.42, P = 0.016) and between rk(trans) and IFP (r = -0.47, P = 0.008). The was no significant correlation between IFP and rv(e). CONCLUSION: There is a moderate negative correlation between IAUC(60m), rk(trans), and IFP in cervical cancer. This suggests that these parameters may be of value in assessment of tumor behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingSame topicMRI in cancer diagnosisFrench-language works237,207