Acidic pH and Detergents Enhance in Vitro Conversion of Human Brain PrPC to a PrPSc-like Form
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the presence of a low concentration of denaturants or detergents, acidic pH triggers a conformational transition of alpha-helices into beta-sheets in recombinant prion protein (PrP), likely mimicking some aspects of the transformation of host-encoded normal cellular PrP (PrP(C)) into its pathogenic isoform (PrP(Sc)). Here we observed the effects of acidic pH and guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl) on the physicochemical and structural properties of PrP(C) derived from normal human brain and determined the ability of the acid/GdnHCl-treated PrP to form a proteinase K (PK)-resistant species in the absence and presence of PrP(Sc) template. After treatment with 1.5 m GdnHCl at pH 3.5, PrP(C) from normal brain homogenates was converted into a detergent-insoluble form similar to PrP(Sc). Unlike PrP(Sc), however, the treated brain PrP(C) was protease-sensitive and retained epitope accessibility to monoclonal antibodies 3F4 and 6H4. Brain PrP(C) treated with acidic pH/GdnHCl acquired partial PK resistance upon further treatment with low concentrations of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Formation of this PrP(Sc)-like isoform was greatly enhanced by incubation with trace quantities of PrP(Sc) from Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease brain. Acid/GdnHCl-treated brain PrP may constitute a "recruitable intermediate" in PrP(Sc) formation. Further structural rearrangement seems essential for this species to acquire PK resistance, which can be promoted by the presence of a PrP(Sc) template.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".