MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of nitrofen-induced congenital diaphragmatic hernia

2000· review· en· W1976830390 on OpenAlexaff
John J. Greer, Douglas W. Allan, Randal P. Babiuk, Robert P. Lemke

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Pulmonology · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCongenital diaphragmatic herniaNitrofenMedicinePathogenesisDiaphragmatic breathingDiaphragm (acoustics)Diaphragmatic herniaContext (archaeology)FetusHerniaPathologySurgeryPregnancyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this review, we discuss recent advances in the study of the pathogenesis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Much of the research has involved the use of an animal model of CDH in which diaphragmatic defects are produced in fetal rats by administering the herbicide nitrofen to dams during mid-gestation. The animal model is described and the relevance to the human condition is discussed. The data derived from the animal studies are critically assessed in the context of commonly cited hypotheses proposed for the pathogenesis of CDH. Finally, experimental strategies are proposed for systematically examining the normal and pathological formation of the pleuroperitoneal fold. We conclude that a malformation of the primordial diaphragm, the pleuroperitoneal fold, underlies the muscle defects associated with CDH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations66
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric PulmonologySame topicCongenital Diaphragmatic Hernia StudiesFrench-language works237,207